On December 15, 1811, the London Statesman issued a warning about the state of the stocking industry in Nottingham. Twenty thousand textile workers had lost their jobs because of the incursion of automated machinery. In protest, the beleaguered workers had begun breaking into factories to smash the machines.
The workers destroying the lace frames were the group who called themselves Luddites, after Ned Ludd, a (likely fictional) knitting-frame apprentice near Leicester who was said to have rebelled against his boss by destroying a frame with a hammer. Today, the word “Luddite” is used as an insult to anyone resistant to technological innovation; it suggests ignoramuses, sticks in the mud, obstacles to progress. But a new book by the journalist and author Brian Merchant, titled “Blood in the Machine,” argues that Luddism stood not against technology. The book is a historical reconsideration of the movement and a gripping narrative of political resistance told in short vignettes. [...]
The book offers plenty of satisfying imagery for the twenty first-century reader experiencing techlash. Merchant argues that the message of Luddism is just as relevant today, as our lives become increasingly enmeshed with digital platforms, from TikTok to Uber and Instacart, that translate our labor and attention into profit, “overlaying a sort of psychic factory onto its workers' lives.” (Who hasn't at times wished to take a hammer to their MacBook?). The Luddites sought revenge against the innovation that was holding them hos- tage. In Merchant's telling, they were activists, punks, and masked celebrities standing up for the skilled working class, the successors to Robin Hood, another product of Nottingham. “Luddite” by that measure sounds like a compliment.
“Blood in the Machine” is being published just as we are facing a new wave of technological automation centering on artificial intelligence – which some, including the consulting firm McKinsey, have labelled the “Fourth Industrial Revolution.”