Ancient Buddhist Relief Carvings from
Amaravathi at the British Museum, 2025.
Museums and galleries in Britain receive 120 million visitors each year. The British Museum alone draws 6.7 million annually. Hence, it is no coincidence that "encyclopaedic" museums (such as the British Museum and the Louvre) should highlight their cosmopolitan appeal.
What does being encyclopaedic have to do with colonialism? A lot, actually.
Museums assert that objects, regardless of where they came from or who claims them as their own, are held "in trust for the nation and the world", as the British Museum puts it. They are seen to belong to humanity as a whole.
By this token, repatriation claims by states and communities appear as [...] lesser possibilities that mustn't be entertained.
Herein lies the paradox of the modern museum; it wields the capacity to enhance both exclusion and access. An object can be viewed but never owned. [...]
The discourse on global custodianship makes its way down from powerful institutions (such as the Bizot Group, a powerful clique of 40 museums) to inform how cultural property should be displayed.
The group adopted, in 2002, the Declaration on the Importance and Value of Universal Museums, underscoring that "museums serve not just the citizens of one nation but the people of every nation". This notion of shared heritage allows them to deflect attention from the historical context in which the objects were extracted.
But common heritage has also become a reason to share. Travelling exhibitions, such as "India and the World," work on the assumption that the world could, and must, be made interconnected through the circulation of objects. [...]
British Museum director Hartwig Fischer observed in his foreword to the exhibition catalogue that "As a museum of the world, for the world, the British Museum can play an important role in working together with partners across the globe to tell such stories."