Chargement de l'audio en cours


Mode édition



Exam file
Page numérique
Épreuve compréhension orale et expression écrite : 1h
Épreuve compréhension écrite et expression écrite : 1h30

Exam file

Compréhension de l’oral


Interview of Michael Jackson

Avant d’écouter → Lisez le titre ci-dessus et regardez le nuage de mots.

Quel peut être le thème de cet enregistrement ? Faites trois hypothèses.
Astuce : vous pouvez vous aider du nuage de mots.

Trouvez cinq autres mots que vous pourriez entendre dans l’enregistrement.
Première écoute → Écoutez l’enregistrement et prenez des notes.

a. Trouvez cinq autres mots que vous pourriez entendre dans l’enregistrement.

b. Prenez en note tous les noms propres. À quoi / qui font-ils référence ?

Utilisez vos notes pour répondre à des questions simples.
a. De quel type de document s'agit-il ? D’où vient-il ?

b. Combien de personnes sont présentes ? Qui sont-elles ?

c. Quel est le thème de l’enregistrement ?

Écoutes suivantes → Écoutez l’enregistrement à nouveau et complétez vos notes avec davantage de détails.

Apportez des précisions sur ce qui est présenté.

Avec l’aide de vos réponses aux questions précédentes, rendez compte de l’enregistrement en français.


Expression écrite

Choisissez un sujet et répondez-y en anglais en 120 mots.

SUJET A : Texte • Post your reaction to the article: explain how you interpret the controversy (focus on the symbols, analyse the context of 1991 and connect it to recent events in America).

SUJET B : Texte et vidéo

“You can’t copy anything and end with anything. It means you’re working without real feeling. No two people on earth are alike, it’s got to be that way in music or it isn’t music.”

Discuss this statement.

SUJET C : Vidéo • Write an article reporting the interview. What does this controversy reveal about the issue of skin colour in the US?


Précis de communication p. 258

Compréhension de l’écrit

For a figure as enigmatic as Michael Jackson, one of the more fascinating paradoxes about his career is this: as he became whiter, he became blacker. Or to put it another way: as his skin became whiter, his work became blacker. […] Sure, critics said, he might sing that it “don’t matter if you’re black or white”, but then why had he turned himself white? Was he bleaching his skin? Was he ashamed of his blackness? […]

In the early 1990s, the public were sceptical to say the least. Jackson first publicly revealed he had vitiligo in a widely watched 1993 interview with Oprah Winfrey. “This is the situation,” he explained. “I have a skin disorder that destroys the pigmentation of the skin. It is something I cannot help, OK? But when people make up stories that I don’t want to be what I am it hurts me … It’s a problem for me that I can’t control.” Jackson did acknowledge having plastic surgery but said he was “horrified” that people concluded that he didn’t want to be black. “I am a black American,” he declared. “I am proud of my race. I am proud of who I am.” […]

The first few minutes of the Black or White video seemed relatively benign and consistent with the utopian calls of previous songs (Can You Feel It, We Are the World, Man in the Mirror). [...] The message seemed to be that we are all part of the human family – distinct but connected – regardless of cosmetic variations.

In the age of Trump and the resurgence of white nationalism, even that multicultural message remains vital. But that’s not all Jackson had to say. Just when the director (John Landis) yells “Cut!” we see a black panther lurking off the soundstage to a back alley. The coda that follows became Jackson’s riskiest artistic move to this point in his career – particularly given the expectations of his “family-friendly” audience. In contrast to the upbeat, mostly optimistic tone of the main portion of the video, Jackson unleashes a flurry of unbridled rage, pain and aggression. He bashes a car in with a crowbar; he grabs and rubs himself; he grunts and screams; he throws a trash can into a storefront (echoing the controversial climax of Spike Lee’s 1989 film, Do the Right Thing), before falling to his knees and tearing off his shirt.[…]

Couched in between the Rodney King beating and the Los Angeles riots, it seems crazy in retrospect not to interpret the short film in that context. Racial tensions in the US, in LA in particular, were hot. In this climate, Michael Jackson – the world’s most famous black entertainer – made a short film in which he escapes the confines of the Hollywood sound stage, transforms into a black panther and channels the pent-up rage and indignation of a nation and moment. […] A few years later, he worked with Spike Lee on the most pointed racial salvo of his career, They Don’t Care About Us, which has been resurrected as an anthem for the Black Lives Matter movement. Still, critics, comedians and the public alike continued to suggest Jackson was ashamed of his race.

“Black and White: how Dangerous kicked off Michael Jackson's race paradox”, Joseph Vogel,, 2018.
Copyright Guardian News & Media Ltd 2019.
Voir les réponses
  1. Where and when does the action take place?
  2. What is the paradox in Michael Jackson's career?
  3. How did Jackson react to the debate over the colour of his skin? What do you think of it?
  4. What seems to be the message of the beginning of the video clip of Black or White?
  5. What political movement the animal chosen could refer to?
  6. How does the ending of the video contrast with the rest? Why?
  7. What do the Rodney King beating and the LA riots refer to?

Connectez-vous pour ajouter des favoris

Pour pouvoir ajouter ou retrouver des favoris, nous devons les lier à votre compte.Et c’est gratuit !

Livre du professeur

Pour pouvoir consulter le livre du professeur, vous devez être connecté avec un compte professeur et avoir validé votre adresse email académique.

Votre avis nous intéresse !
Recommanderiez-vous notre site web à un(e) collègue ?

Peu probable
Très probable

Cliquez sur le score que vous voulez donner.