1950s Education
P.52-53
Group 1
David Hoffman/Youtube
Group 2
“Older Men Cling to 1950s, ‘60s Blueprint of Masculinity”
As men age, they continue to follow dominant ideas of masculinity learned as youth, leaving them unequipped for the assaults of age [...]. Men who embodied the prevailing1 culture and societal hallmarks of manliness as younger men‒projecting an aura of toughness and independence, avoiding crying and vulnerability, while courageously taking risks- are confronted by the development of health problems, loss of spouses and loved ones, retirement and needing to be a caregiver for ailing2 family members in later life. [...]
This masculinity “script” still embraced by older men was outlined as the four-part Blueprint of Manhood, first published by sociologist Robert Brannon when the men in the studies were entering adulthood in the 1970s. The blueprint3 included:
No Sissy Stuff - men are to avoid being feminine, show no weakness and hide intimate aspects of their lives.
The Big Wheel - men must gain and retain respect and power and are expected to seek success in all they do.
The Sturdy Oak - men are to be “the strong, silent type” by projecting an air of confidence and remaining calm no matter what.
Give ‘em Hell - men are to be tough, adventurous, never give up and live life on the edge.
This masculinity “script” still embraced by older men was outlined as the four-part Blueprint of Manhood, first published by sociologist Robert Brannon when the men in the studies were entering adulthood in the 1970s. The blueprint3 included:
No Sissy Stuff - men are to avoid being feminine, show no weakness and hide intimate aspects of their lives.
The Big Wheel - men must gain and retain respect and power and are expected to seek success in all they do.
The Sturdy Oak - men are to be “the strong, silent type” by projecting an air of confidence and remaining calm no matter what.
Give ‘em Hell - men are to be tough, adventurous, never give up and live life on the edge.
“Older Men Cling to 1950s, ‘60s Blueprint of Masculinity”, Case Reserve Western University, Phys.org, 2016.
1. predominant 2. with poor health 3. scheme
Group 3
“The 1950s Man in Me”
A lot has changed since the 1950s. [...]
Not so long ago a man would have no option but to spend most of his time working because it was common knowledge that men were not emotionally competent enough to raise their babies and children. It was better for a man to come in with an iron fist1 at the end of the day, so that the children would be scared of him and toe the line. Wait till your father gets home!
This was the way it was meant to be because men were more competitive and adventurous. A man wasn’t a natural carer and wasn’t outwardly2 affectionate. [...]
If he was exposed to the genuine3 emotions of others, or became more directly responsible for the emotional development of his children, he might realise his own emotional depth; he might lose the ability to push his emotion aside or hide it away. If that happened to a man, it would make it impossible for him to be the singularly focused, iron fist, the world, the workplace, and the family required him to be. Pride, aggression and anger and any form of expression that provided him with control were allowed but if he expressed any other emotion, well, he simply wasn’t a man, and not being a man in a patriarchal world – we all know – is a pretty damning thing.
Not so long ago a man would have no option but to spend most of his time working because it was common knowledge that men were not emotionally competent enough to raise their babies and children. It was better for a man to come in with an iron fist1 at the end of the day, so that the children would be scared of him and toe the line. Wait till your father gets home!
This was the way it was meant to be because men were more competitive and adventurous. A man wasn’t a natural carer and wasn’t outwardly2 affectionate. [...]
If he was exposed to the genuine3 emotions of others, or became more directly responsible for the emotional development of his children, he might realise his own emotional depth; he might lose the ability to push his emotion aside or hide it away. If that happened to a man, it would make it impossible for him to be the singularly focused, iron fist, the world, the workplace, and the family required him to be. Pride, aggression and anger and any form of expression that provided him with control were allowed but if he expressed any other emotion, well, he simply wasn’t a man, and not being a man in a patriarchal world – we all know – is a pretty damning thing.
“The 1950s Man in Me”, Clint Greagen, The Good Men Project, 2015.
1. with a firm, strong hand 2. superficially 3. authentic, real
You are in charge of one document.
1
2
Useful vocabulary: Girls / Boys were expected to behave...
The rules dictated that... ...was considered unnatural
Let's talk this out! MEDIATION
MEDIATION
Share your findings and learn about the other documents.
3
b. Explain what a traditional family would have looked like back then. To what extent were people free to lead their lives as they wished?
4
Useful vocabulary: The main difference is that...
In the 1950s, education was... whereas today it is... I think / don’t think it is dramatically different since / because / as...
Toolbox
Toolbox
- dreadful / outrageous (adj.)
- hit a nerve (exp.)
- conformity (n.)
- fulfillment (n.)
- model (n.)
- mold (n.)
- indoctrinate (v.)
Grammar in progress
for / since / ago
2) Men have followed the masculine blueprint for decades.
3) Not so long ago, men spent their days at work.
a. Quel temps verbal est utilisé dans les phrases ci-dessus ?
b. Quel type d’informations retrouvez-vous après since et for ?
une date précise
une durée
un point de départ temporel
Let’s learn!
Word hunt
Look at the adjective list your teacher will give you. You have 2 minutes to scan both texts and find either an antonym or a synonym for each item in your list. The first one to complete the list correctly wins.Téléchargez le kit de jeu en cliquant ici.
On your way to the task ❯❯ Step 1
